The Iranian opposition said that the majority of members of the Legislative Assembly of California - the largest US state - declared their support for the uprising of the Iranian people and Mrs. Maryam Rajavi's plan of 10 pursuits, an editorial on the official opposition website spoke of the escalation of opposition inside the country against the mullahs' regime. According to a press release obtained by Alyoum8th, the majority of the members of the California Legislative Assembly supported the uprising of the Iranian people, who courageously defended their fundamental rights and freedoms and supported Mrs. Maryam Rajavi's 10-point plan. Among the signatories are 28 Democratic and 14 Republican representatives out of a total of 80 members of the Legislative Assembly of the most populous U.S. state, its economy is the fifth largest in the world after the United States, China, Japan and Germany. "The Iranian people have been deprived of their fundamental freedoms, so they reject the monarchical dictatorship and religious tyranny, as reflected in the protest slogans. A majority of California lawmakers asserted that the American people support the Iranian people's desire for a democratic, non-nuclear republic based on separation of religion and state. The American people's sympathy for the Iranian people was revealed in support of the absolute majority of the U.S. House of Representatives in Congress 118 in Resolution 100, which supports "Mrs. Maryam Rajavi's 10-point plan for Iran's future, which calls for universal suffrage, free elections and a free market, gender equality, religious and ethnic equality, and a foreign policy based on peaceful coexistence and a non-nuclear Iran." The majority of the California legislature noted that Iran's protests and uprising are rooted in more than four decades of organized resistance against the dictatorship and are led by women who have been tortured, sexually assaulted and killed. A majority of California lawmakers stressed in their statement that Mrs. Rajavi's 10-point plan deserves the support of every American. In recent months, the majority of Arizona, South Carolina and North Carolina state parliaments have supported Maryam Rajavi's ten-point plan for Iran's future. On the other hand, the "combined" group, which is allied with the rule of Wali al-Faqih in Iran, launched a series of confessions of the poor conditions of the regime, and criticism of its way of managing its crises, wondering about the causes of losses and conflicts, and the transformation of the mullahs' supporters into critics of the policy of Ebrahim Raisi, without neglecting the exposure of the crudeness and corruption of the idea of unifying the pillars of government, whose results were clearly visible. Acknowledging the failure of Khamenei's unilateral rule, regime faltering, and volatile conditions are not limited to acknowledging. Coinciding with the two-year anniversary of the election scandal over a team or media outlet, many of those close to the government have acknowledged the failure of the unification theory. Ahmad Zeidabadi said that Raisi's government is the last chance, pointing to the impossibility of the success of its way of thinking, the former deputy head of the Tehran City Council, Hassan Bayadi, stressed that the same group that was sympathetic has now turned into several factions, which indicates the stupidity of its work, illusions and inability to plan, government expert Mohsen Ranani wondered about "the good they saw from this unification," stressing the absence of solutions to the problems that the country suffers from, according to a reading by government expert Abdolreza Dauri that the project Larijani's adviser in the tenth parliament expressed his belief that the number of official members of the Steadfastness Front in the country does not exceed two bus passengers, and Hossein Marashi called on the government to admit failure and change the track before it is too late. The fact that can be gleaned from some of the confessions is that the failure of Ebrahim Raisi does not only mean the failure of the government as much as it is evidence of the failure of a line that was supposed to advance with the contraction and prevent uprisings and successes of the resistance. The revolution and the ideal will be affected by this policy, and it will not be limited to the government alone. According to a letter, Khamenei wanted to buy time for his regime, amputating its limbs, and as the uprising and resistance progressed, the entire regime faced the threat of collapse and destruction. Abbas Abdi, a government expert, said in reference to the serious effects of the defeat on the integrity of the regime, "They want to survive by eliminating others, but they do not see this as a factor of destruction for them, and the faster this path becomes, the faster the destruction process," while Mehdi Nasiri, editor-in-chief of the newspaper "Kayhan", pointed out that "the regime is humiliated to the point of kidnapping one of its citizens to collect the withheld money" and the smell of humiliation and despair emanates from those who wanted to turn the White House into a Husseiniya, they talked about overcoming the historical turning point, They turned Iran into a shop that traded oil for food and medicine. The arrival of confessions of failure to the backbone of the regime demonstrates the state of despair and frustration reached by the rule of the mullahs, which is facing the effects of its inability to solve its crises, which have compounded and worsened over the past two years, heralding an imminent fall. The official website of the Iranian opposition said that the positions of the parties to the Khamenei regime on information related to the release of five hostages in exchange for the mullahs' regime receiving $ 6 billion of withheld Iranian funds, are mixed. According to the editorial of the People's Mojahedin website of Iran, the media and propaganda platforms affiliated with Khamenei and Raisi used descriptions and phrases such as "honorable agreement", "agreement from a position of strength", "bearing fruit", "liberating another $6 billion without the JCPOA and without a fatf," while the defeated current called it descriptions such as "humiliating," "shameful," "humiliating and embarrassing," "more humiliating than the oil-for-food program," and "honorable surrender." Abbas Abdi, who is affiliated with the defeated movement, wrote that "all that others have done in foreign policy is to humiliate the country, and if they make the worst agreements, they are described as wise, and from a position of ability." The movement's Arman Amroz newspaper also warned that the move to take hostages and free the withheld funds is based on Mohsen Rezaei's ideas to solve economic problems, in which he clearly mocks Rezaei's statements in which he threatened to take 1,000 hostages and force the United States to pay a few billion to free them, thus solving the economic crisis if Washington seeks a military attack. This speech expressed al-Wali al-Faqih's plan to solve the economic crisis and other problems, and his inability to reach out to the American military, which prompted him to hold his citizens with second citizenship hostage to recover the withheld funds after a few years, and the loss of a billion dollars of it in the framework of oil for food. Mehdi Nasiri, former editor-in-chief of the newspaper "Kayhan", believes that the regime is humiliated to the extent that it kidnaps its citizens to collect withheld money, pointing to the emission of the smell of humiliation and despair from this practice, and stopping at the talk of "those who want to turn the White House into a Husseiniya" about going through a historical turning point that leads to the emergence of a strong Islamic republic, to reach at the end of his reading to turn Iran into a store that indulges in the oil trade in exchange for food and medicine, so that people do not die of hunger and lack of medicine, holding Khamenei responsible All that humiliation. The deal put Khamenei's rule in a very difficult position, and showed him as unable to embellish his humiliation, and inserted it into the minds of simple and naïve people as an honorable victory and an achievement that gets his regime out of its predicament, which turned it into a political burden, and a point of attraction that increases the intensity of its internal crises.